linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:43:02 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Cleo John <waterdev@...axycrow.de>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header

On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 02:38:43PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> Hey Connor,
> 
> On Sun, 9. October 2022, 14:14:52 CEST, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Hey Cleo,
> > 
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 02:03:40PM +0200, Cleo John wrote:
> > > Fixed styling in riscv ucontext header
> > 
> > This should probably be "riscv: fix styling..."
> 
> okay yea, I will change this in a second patch.
> 
> > > This patch changes the two comments in ucontext.h by getting them up to
> > > the cody style proposed by torwalds.
> > s/This patch changes/Change
> > 
> > Looks like some typos here too & your lines need to be wrapped at 72
> > characters for commit messages. git usually enforces that automatically
> > when you do a `git commit`.
> I will wrap the lines, but where are the typos if I may ask?
>

"cody style" & s/w/v/ in Linus' name.

> > > In my opinion this also improves the readability so I think this is a
> > > useful change to do. Please also tell me if you have a different opinion.
> > 
> > FYI commentary on the patch should go below the ---.
> will note
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Cleo John <waterdev@...axycrow.de>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h index 44eb993950e5..0cd6f8616985
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> > > @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> > > 
> > >  	/* There's some padding here to allow sigset_t to be expanded in 
> the
> > 
> > Why fix the closing comment but leave the opening ones incorrect?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
> I mixed the code style up with the one in net/ -will fix
> 
> Thanks,
> Cleo.
> 
> > >  	 * future.  Though this is unlikely, other architectures put 
> uc_sigmask
> > >  	 * at the end of this structure and explicitly state it can be
> > > 
> > > -	 * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here. */
> > > +	 * expanded, so we didn't want to box ourselves in here.
> > > +	 */
> > > 
> > >  	__u8		  __unused[1024 / 8 - sizeof(sigset_t)];
> > >  	/* We can't put uc_sigmask at the end of this structure because we 
> need
> > >  	
> > >  	 * to be able to expand sigcontext in the future.  For example, 
> the
> > > 
> > > @@ -27,7 +28,8 @@ struct ucontext {
> > > 
> > >  	 * ucontext, so we're putting this at the end in order to allow 
> for
> > >  	 * infinite extensibility.  Since we know this will be extended and 
> we
> > >  	 * assume sigset_t won't be extended an extreme amount, we're
> > > 
> > > -	 * prioritizing this. */
> > > +	 * prioritizing this.
> > > +	 */
> > > 
> > >  	struct sigcontext uc_mcontext;
> > >  
> > >  };
>