[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54096629-fef0-8952-6a84-c1a12e38a442@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 15:39:11 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Assign PCI domain by ida_alloc()
Le 09/10/2022 à 13:29, Pali Rohár a écrit :
> On Thursday 18 August 2022 11:52:20 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 06:37:56PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> On Thursday 18 August 2022 16:59:33 Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:50:09PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>>>> PING?
>>>>
>>>> Pretty much anything sent during the merge window, and just before the
>>>> merge window gets thrown away. Please rebase onto the current pci tree
>>>> and repost.
>>>
>>> Please write it pretty clear that you are not interested in those
>>> patches, and not hiding this info behind asking me after month of
>>> waiting for another work of rebase with sending them at eight o'clock
>>> during full moon. It is pretty ridiculous how to say "go away". Thanks.
>>
>> Nobody is saying "go away". I apologize that I haven't had time to
>> look at this yet.
>>
>> It's still in patchwork [1], and if it still applies cleanly to
>> v6.0-rc1, you don't need to do anything. If it requires rebasing to
>> apply cleanly, it will expedite things if you do that.
>>
>> Bjorn
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20220714184130.5436-1-pali@kernel.org/
>
> It applies cleanly on v6.0-rc1.
>
On linux-next, the diff applies, but with offsets on pci.c and pci.h.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists