linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] checksyscalls: Ignore fstat to silence build warning on LoongArch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 09 Oct 2022 22:01:57 +0800
From:   Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] checksyscalls: Ignore fstat to silence build warning
 on LoongArch

On Sun, 2022-10-09 at 12:33 +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/30/2022 11:27 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > fstat is replaced by statx on the new architecture, so an exception
> > is added to the checksyscalls script to silence the following build
> > warning on LoongArch:
> > 
> >   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > <stdin>:569:2: warning: #warning syscall fstat not implemented [-
> > Wcpp]
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The above warning still exists when build the latest loongarch-next.
> 
> Do you know which tree this patch will go through?
> 
> Could you please pick it up via your tree in this merge window?

A similar change 3ef6ca4f354c ("checksyscalls: Unconditionally ignore
fstat{,at}64") was merged through RISC-V tree, so it should be OK to
merge this from loongarch-next.

Not sure if we need to get an Ack from someone first though.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University