linux-kernel - Re: kernel style preference trivia: '* const' vs '*const' ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 9 Oct 2022 18:52:50 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel style preference trivia: '* const' vs '*const' ?

On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 6:21 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> The kernel uses '* const' about 10:1 over '*const'

Yeah, going with the most commonly used one sounds best.

clang-format will be able to handle either way with
`SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers` as soon as the minimum is LLVM 12.

Cheers,
Miguel