[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221009183723.52037-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 18:37:23 +0000
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Add a missed closing parenthesis
Hi Paul,
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 04:10:00 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:49:25AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > Description of io_stop_wc(), which added by commit d5624bb29f49
> > ("asm-generic: introduce io_stop_wc() and add implementation for
> > ARM64"), have unclosed parenthesis. This commit closes it.
> >
> > Fixes: d5624bb29f49 ("asm-generic: introduce io_stop_wc() and add implementation for ARM64")
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
>
> I have pulled this in, good eyes, and thank you!
Thank you for quick reply :)
>
> On the other three, we have traditionally asked for an ack from a
> Korean speaker. Do we still feel the need to do this?
I have asked review of the patches to my friend. I'm unsure if my friend could
do that in a timely manner, as my friend could also be busy. Let's wait and
see.
IMHO, such review is not essential for this kind of incremental document
updates, as I'd prefer making the doc up-to-date even if it contains some
trivial errors, as long as the history is well manged and therefore such errors
could be fixed later with good explanations.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists