linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 13/18] thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221009205136.1201774-13-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun,  9 Oct 2022 16:51:30 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rikard.falkeborn@...il.com,
        yury.norov@...il.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 13/18] thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash

From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 68b99e94a4a2db6ba9b31fe0485e057b9354a640 ]

When CPU 0 is offline and intel_powerclamp is used to inject
idle, it generates kernel BUG:

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/15687
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
CPU: 4 PID: 15687 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7+ #57
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63
dump_stack+0x10/0x16
check_preemption_disabled+0xdd/0xe0
debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x7f/0xf9 [intel_powerclamp]
...
...

Here CPU 0 is the control CPU by default and changed to the current CPU,
if CPU 0 offlined. This check has to be performed under cpus_read_lock(),
hence the above warning.

Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid this BUG.

Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
index c841ab37e7c6..46cd799af148 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -532,8 +532,10 @@ static int start_power_clamp(void)
 
 	/* prefer BSP */
 	control_cpu = 0;
-	if (!cpu_online(control_cpu))
-		control_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	if (!cpu_online(control_cpu)) {
+		control_cpu = get_cpu();
+		put_cpu();
+	}
 
 	clamping = true;
 	schedule_delayed_work(&poll_pkg_cstate_work, 0);
-- 
2.35.1