[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221009221453.1216158-64-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 18:14:42 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 64/73] net: If sock is dead don't access sock's sk_wq in sk_stream_wait_memory
From: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 3f8ef65af927db247418d4e1db49164d7a158fc5 ]
Fixes the below NULL pointer dereference:
[...]
[ 14.471200] Call Trace:
[ 14.471562] <TASK>
[ 14.471882] lock_acquire+0x245/0x2e0
[ 14.472416] ? remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50
[ 14.473014] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x17/0x50
[ 14.473681] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x50
[ 14.474318] ? remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50
[ 14.474907] remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50
[ 14.475480] sk_stream_wait_memory+0x20d/0x340
[ 14.476127] ? do_wait_intr_irq+0x80/0x80
[ 14.476704] do_tcp_sendpages+0x287/0x600
[ 14.477283] tcp_bpf_push+0xab/0x260
[ 14.477817] tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir+0x297/0x500
[ 14.478461] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x77/0xe0
[ 14.479096] tcp_bpf_send_verdict+0x105/0x470
[ 14.479729] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x318/0x4f0
[ 14.480311] sock_sendmsg+0x2d/0x40
[ 14.480822] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1b4/0x1c0
[ 14.481390] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x62/0x80
[ 14.482048] ___sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0
[ 14.482580] ? vmf_insert_pfn_prot+0x91/0x150
[ 14.483215] ? __do_fault+0x2a/0x1a0
[ 14.483738] ? do_fault+0x15e/0x5d0
[ 14.484246] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x56b/0x1040
[ 14.484874] ? lock_is_held_type+0xdf/0x130
[ 14.485474] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[ 14.486046] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x41/0x70
[ 14.486587] __sys_sendmsg+0x41/0x70
[ 14.487105] ? intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core+0x350/0x350
[ 14.487822] do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80
[ 14.488345] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[...]
The test scenario has the following flow:
thread1 thread2
----------- ---------------
tcp_bpf_sendmsg
tcp_bpf_send_verdict
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir sock_close
tcp_bpf_push_locked __sock_release
tcp_bpf_push //inet_release
do_tcp_sendpages sock->ops->release
sk_stream_wait_memory // tcp_close
sk_wait_event sk->sk_prot->close
release_sock(__sk);
***
lock_sock(sk);
__tcp_close
sock_orphan(sk)
sk->sk_wq = NULL
release_sock
****
lock_sock(__sk);
remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
sk_sleep(sk)
//NULL pointer dereference
&rcu_dereference_raw(sk->sk_wq)->wait
While waiting for memory in thread1, the socket is released with its wait
queue because thread2 has closed it. This caused by tcp_bpf_send_verdict
didn't increase the f_count of psock->sk_redir->sk_socket->file in thread1.
We should check if SOCK_DEAD flag is set on wakeup in sk_stream_wait_memory
before accessing the wait queue.
Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220823133755.314697-2-liujian56@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/core/stream.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/stream.c b/net/core/stream.c
index 06b36c730ce8..2ee82115b919 100644
--- a/net/core/stream.c
+++ b/net/core/stream.c
@@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ int sk_stream_wait_memory(struct sock *sk, long *timeo_p)
*timeo_p = current_timeo;
}
out:
- remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
+ if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
+ remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
return err;
do_error:
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists