lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Oct 2022 16:36:16 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Richard Rogalski <rrogalski@...anota.com>
Cc:     Linux Pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@....com>
Subject: Re: SPARC64: getting "no compatible bridge window" errors :/

[+cc Lijo]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 05:35:02PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:11:06PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Alex, David, sparclinux, LKML]
> > 
> > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 06:59:23PM +0200, Richard Rogalski wrote:
> > > I hope this is the right place for this.
> > 
> > This is great, thanks a lot for your report!  Is this a regression?
> > If so, what's the most recent kernel that worked?  
> > 
> > > In my dmesg output, I get things like:
> > > 
> > > pci 0000:04:00.0: can't claim VGA legacy [mem 0x000a0000-0x000bffff]: no compatible bridge window
> > > pci 0000:06:00.0: can't claim VGA legacy [mem 0x000a0000-0x000bffff]: no compatible bridge window
> > > pci 0000:06:00.1: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x84110200000-0x84110203fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
> > > 
> > > I opened a bug for amdgpu [here](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2169) but looking further into it I think it is caused by deeper PCIe problems :\
> > > 
> > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/cbf47807972c8a990bb2a8cdbb39ad9e/8C7CA9QNG dmesg log
> > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/6a799425dea50febd82f8bc11e54433a/ll.txt lspci -vv
> > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/7d4a794b1f7d67a1ffcdee5dfdec3ad6/config.txt kernel .config
> > 
> > Your error output attachment [1] contains an address that looks like
> > it's in 06:00.0 BAR 5:
> > 
> >   pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x24: [mem 0x84001200000-0x8400123ffff]
> >   NON-RESUMABLE ERROR: insn effective address [0x0000084001201410]
> > 
> > This looks like an amdgpu issue.  There have been recent changes like
> > c1c39032a074 ("drm/amdgpu: make sure to init common IP before gmc")
> > and dd6aeb4e5f59 ("drm/amdgpu: Don't enable LTR if not supported")
> > that could be related.

Ping for any updates?  Added Lijo, who fixed the LTR issue.

> > The PCI "no compatible bridge window" warnings are definitely an
> > issue, but I don't think they're related to the amdgpu crash:
> > 
> >   pci@400: PCI MEM64 [mem 0x84100000000-0x84dffffffff] offset 80000000000
> >   pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x84100000000-0x84dffffffff] (bus address [0x4100000000-0x4dffffffff])
> >   pci 0000:09:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x84120000000-0x8412007ffff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
> > 
> > Those and this from lspci:
> > 
> >   0000:01:00.0 bridge to [bus 02-09] window [mem 0x4100000000-0x412fffffff pref]
> >   0000:02:0c.0 bridge to [bus 09]    window [mem 0x4120000000-0x412fffffff pref]
> >   0000:09:00.0 Intel 82599ES NIC Region 0: Memory at 0x84120000000
> > 
> > are telling us there's something wrong with how the resource-to-bus
> > offset is being applied.  It looks like the offset was applied to the
> > NIC BAR, but didn't get applied to the bridge windows.
> > 
> > Could you start a new thread here (linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> > linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, and sparclinux@...r.kernel.org) for this
> > issue and attach the dmesg log when booting with "ofpci_debug=1"?
> 
> Any chance you could collect a dmesg log with "ofpci_debug=1"?
> 
> I'd like to look at the resource-to-bus offset issue.

I would still like to see this dmesg log if possible.

> > Do the devices we complain about (NICs and storage HBAs 09:00.0,
> > 09:00.1, 0d:00.0, 0d:00.1, 0e:00.0, 0f:00.0, 0001:03:00.0,
> > 0001:03:00.1, 0001:0:00.0, 0001:0a:00.1) work?
> > 
> > Bjorn
> > 
> > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/b51f4d6783eeebf90de9a400525d07d6/qq

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ