linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Convert Unisoc EIC controller binding to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:52:11 +0800
From:   Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Convert Unisoc EIC controller
 binding to yaml

On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 23:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/10/2022 04:57, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> >>> +        eic_debounce: gpio@...10000 {
> >>> +            compatible = "sprd,sc9860-eic-debounce";
> >>> +            reg = <0 0x40210000 0 0x80>;
> >>> +            gpio-controller;
> >>> +            #gpio-cells = <2>;
> >>> +            interrupt-controller;
> >>> +            #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> >>> +            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 52 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >>> +        };
> >>> +    };
> >>> +
> >>> +    sc2730_pmic {
> >>
> >> If you insisted to keep it, at least should be correct, so just pmic.
> >>
> >>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> >>> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> >>> +
> >>> +        pmic_eic: gpio@300 {
> >>
> >> It's exactly the same example as above - all same properties. Drop it or
> >> bring some differences.
> >
> > The differences are on #address-cells and #size-cells.
> >
>
> Which don't really matter...

Alright, will drop it in the next version.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>