[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:34:55 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, treding@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bbasu@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com,
ksitaraman@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] cpufreq: tegra194: Add support for Tegra239
On 04-10-22, 10:27, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 04:36:46PM +0530, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> > @@ -586,6 +586,7 @@ static int tegra194_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > static const struct of_device_id tegra194_cpufreq_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra194-ccplex", .data = &tegra194_cpufreq_soc },
> > { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra234-ccplex-cluster", .data = &tegra234_cpufreq_soc },
> > + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra239-ccplex-cluster", .data = &tegra239_cpufreq_soc },
>
> Not documented.
Sumit, can you please send a patch to document this in bindings ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists