[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:15:26 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] iio: accel: Support Kionix/ROHM KX022A
accelerometer
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 01:33:51PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 21:32:11 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 05:38:14PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
...
> > > +module_param(g_kx022a_use_buffer, bool, 0);
> > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(g_kx022a_use_buffer,
> > > + "Buffer samples. Use at own risk. Fifo must not overflow");
> >
> > Why?! We usually do not allow module parameters in the new code.
>
> Badly broken hardware - was my suggestion. Alternatives if there are usecases
> that need to use the fifo, but it can wedge hard in a fashion that is impossible
> to prevent from the driver? My gut feeling is still drop the support entirely
> with a strong comment in the code that the hardware is broken in a fashion we don't
> know how to work around.
I also would drop this from upstream and if anybody curious, provide some kind
of GitHub gist for that. Also it needs some communication with a vendor to
clarify the things.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists