[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221010114420.beytjynzshjgiy6y@houat>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:44:20 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dom Cobley <popcornmix@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/vc4: Fix the core clock behaviour
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 02:50:19PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Those patches used to be part of a larger clock fixes series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20220715160014.2623107-1-maxime@cerno.tech/
>
> However, that series doesn't seem to be getting anywhere, so I've split out
> these patches that fix a regression that has been there since 5.18 and that
> prevents the 4k output from working on the RaspberryPi4.
>
> Hopefully, we will be able to merge those patches through the DRM tree to avoid
> any further disruption.
Could you review this? Ideally this would be merged through drm-misc due
to the dependencies between the new firmware functions and the DRM
patches.
Thanks!
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists