[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221010131234.e4gxdaixs3acgayf@SoMainline.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:12:34 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 34/40] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: align TLMM pin
configuration with DT schema
On 2022-10-10 07:31:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/10/2022 06:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 09/10/2022 13:46, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>> [..]
> >>> - cmd {
> >>> + cmd-pins-pins {
> >>
> >> Is this double -pins-pins suffix intended?
> >>
> >
> > No, thanks for noticing it.
>
> Wait, you commented on patch which was already merged. Fix is here already:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220930192954.242546-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
Correct, I came across this while working on another SoC on -next and
wasn't sure if this patch was pulled in through some staging branch, or
if you or I should send up a followup patch. Seems you've already done
so, thanks!
- Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists