[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08616A924F416E8E+327e01d8dcbf$2237dbe0$66a793a0$@lohu.info>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 23:44:06 +0800
From: "Soha Jin" <soha@...u.info>
To: "'Andrew Lunn'" <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "'Heiner Kallweit'" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"'David S. Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"'Eric Dumazet'" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"'Jakub Kicinski'" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"'Paolo Abeni'" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"'Russell King'" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: mdiobus: add fwnode_phy_is_fixed_link()
Hello Andrew,
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2022 11:03 PM
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:20:06AM +0800, Soha Jin wrote:
> > A helper function to check if PHY is fixed link with fwnode properties.
> > This is similar to of_phy_is_fixed_link.
>
> You need to include a user of this new function.
Greg already notified me about this. I was thinking this patch and my
driver patches are on different trees, so I split the patches into
different parts. I will include this patch in my driver patch's v2 later
and ask you to review then. Sorry for the mistake.
> Also, not that ACPI only defines the 'new binding' for fixed-link. If this is
> being called on a device which is ACPI underneath, it should only return true
> for the 'new binding', not the old binding.
Thanks for the information, I will correct this.
Regards,
Soha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists