[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 19:43:44 +0300
From: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: starqltechn: add initial device tree
for starqltechn
(...)
>
> Why do you have DTSI for one DTS?
Samsung has several devices on sdm845 SoC (at least 3 phones:
starqltechn, starq2ltechn, crownltechn). I don't have plans to
introduce support for any new Samsung sdm845 device except
starqltechn, but I guess we should extract common dtsi now to make
future contributions easier. I think I should rename common dtsi file
to '$soc-$vendor-common.dtsi', like others device trees doing now
>
(...)
--
Best regards,
Dzmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists