linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] timers: replace in_irq() with in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:31:44 -0700
From:   John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To:     yexingchen116@...il.com
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] timers: replace in_irq() with in_hardirq()

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:06 PM <yexingchen116@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
> macro in_hardirq().

Would it make sense to replace both instances of in_irq() in that file at once?

thanks
-john