linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8192e: remove unnecessary braces for single statement blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 21:50:33 +0200
From:   Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To:     Rui Li <me@...ui.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8192e: remove unnecessary braces for
 single statement blocks

On 10/10/22 01:21, Rui Li wrote:
> This commit cleans up checkpatch warning as follows:
> braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rui Li <me@...ui.org>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
>   - Correct commit message title
>   - Add changelog
> 
> Changes since v1:
>   - Only fix one of checkpatch warnings
> ---
>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c |  3 +--
>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c |  9 +++------
>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c     | 12 ++++--------
>   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
> index 18e4e5d84878..8d20b0deca37 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
> @@ -1112,9 +1112,8 @@ void  rtl92e_fill_tx_desc(struct net_device *dev, struct tx_desc *pdesc,
>   	if (cb_desc->bHwSec) {
>   		static u8 tmp;
>   
> -		if (!tmp) {
> +		if (!tmp)
>   			tmp = 1;
> -		}
>   		switch (priv->rtllib->pairwise_key_type) {
>   		case KEY_TYPE_WEP40:
>   		case KEY_TYPE_WEP104:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
> index 1b592258e640..4e3d183be0f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
> @@ -522,9 +522,8 @@ static bool _rtl92e_bb_config_para_file(struct net_device *dev)
>   		rtStatus  = rtl92e_check_bb_and_rf(dev,
>   						   (enum hw90_block)eCheckItem,
>   						   (enum rf90_radio_path)0);
> -		if (!rtStatus) {
> +		if (!rtStatus)
>   			return rtStatus;
> -		}
>   	}
>   	rtl92e_set_bb_reg(dev, rFPGA0_RFMOD, bCCKEn|bOFDMEn, 0x0);
>   	_rtl92e_phy_config_bb(dev, BaseBand_Config_PHY_REG);
> @@ -1379,9 +1378,8 @@ static bool _rtl92e_set_rf_power_state(struct net_device *dev,
>   					i++;
>   				}
>   
> -				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x) {
> +				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x)
>   					break;
> -				}
>   			}
>   			rtl92e_set_rf_off(dev);
>   			break;
> @@ -1398,9 +1396,8 @@ static bool _rtl92e_set_rf_power_state(struct net_device *dev,
>   					i++;
>   				}
>   
> -				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x) {
> +				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x)
>   					break;
> -				}
>   			}
>   
>   			if (pPSC->RegRfPsLevel & RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_HALT_NIC &&
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> index 702551056227..641961a14c52 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> @@ -267,9 +267,8 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_check_ac_dc_power(struct net_device *dev)
>   			"PATH=/usr/bin:/bin",
>   			 NULL};
>   
> -	if (priv->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_SILENT) {
> +	if (priv->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_SILENT)
>   		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	if (priv->rtllib->state != RTLLIB_LINKED)
>   		return;
> @@ -330,9 +329,8 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_check_rate_adaptive(struct net_device *dev)
>   	bool bshort_gi_enabled = false;
>   	static u8 ping_rssi_state;
>   
> -	if (!priv->up) {
> +	if (!priv->up)
>   		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	if (pra->rate_adaptive_disabled)
>   		return;
> @@ -777,9 +775,8 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_tx_power_tracking_cb_thermal(struct net_device *dev)
>   		tmpRegA = rtl92e_get_bb_reg(dev, rOFDM0_XATxIQImbalance,
>   					    bMaskDWord);
>   		for (i = 0; i < OFDM_Table_Length; i++) {
> -			if (tmpRegA == OFDMSwingTable[i]) {
> +			if (tmpRegA == OFDMSwingTable[i])
>   				priv->OFDM_index[0] = i;
> -			}
>   		}
>   
>   		TempCCk = rtl92e_get_bb_reg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter1, bMaskByte2);
> @@ -1066,9 +1063,8 @@ void rtl92e_dm_restore_state(struct net_device *dev)
>   	u32	reg_ratr = priv->rate_adaptive.last_ratr;
>   	u32 ratr_value;
>   
> -	if (!priv->up) {
> +	if (!priv->up)
>   		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	if (priv->rate_adaptive.rate_adaptive_disabled)
>   		return;

Tested-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>