[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221011024831.322799-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:48:31 +0000
From: yexingchen116@...il.com
To: pmladek@...e.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] vsprintf: replace in_irq() with in_hardirq()
From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
macro in_hardirq().
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
---
lib/vsprintf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 24f37bab8bc1..5b0611c00956 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ char *restricted_pointer(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
* kptr_restrict==1 cannot be used in IRQ context
* because its test for CAP_SYSLOG would be meaningless.
*/
- if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi()) {
+ if (in_hardirq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi()) {
if (spec.field_width == -1)
spec.field_width = 2 * sizeof(ptr);
return error_string(buf, end, "pK-error", spec);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists