[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221011164143.52c84421@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:41:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
x86@...nel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Generic IPI sending tracepoint
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 17:40:26 +0100
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com> wrote:
> > You could keep the tracepoint as a mask, and then make it pretty, like cpus=3-5,8
> > in user-space. For example with a trace-cmd/perf loadable plugin, libtracefs helper.
> >
>
> That's a nice idea, the one downside I see is that means registering an
> event handler for all events with cpumasks rather than directly targeting
> cpumask fields, but that doesn't look too horrible. I'll dig a bit in that
> direction.
We could just make all all dynamic array's of unsigned long use that
format? I don't know of any other event that has dynamic arrays of
unsigned longs. And doing a search doesn't come up with any.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists