[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221011231727.8090-4-bb@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:17:19 -0500
From: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Linux Thermal <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Device Tree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] thermal: k3_j72xx_bandgap: remove fuse_base from structure
'fuse_base' is only needed during the initial probe function to provide
a software trimming method for some devices effected by TI's i2128
erratum. Not all devices that use this hardware device will need to map
this eFuse region.
Remove fuse_base from the main k3_j72xx_bandgap structure
Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
---
drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c
index b9d20026771a5..99df62295a11f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct k3_j72xx_bandgap {
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *base;
void __iomem *cfg2_base;
- void __iomem *fuse_base;
struct k3_thermal_data *ts_data[K3_VTM_MAX_NUM_TS];
};
@@ -276,7 +275,7 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_temp_to_adc_code(int temp)
}
static void get_efuse_values(int id, struct k3_thermal_data *data, int *err,
- struct k3_j72xx_bandgap *bgp)
+ void __iomem *fuse_base)
{
int i, tmp, pow;
int ct_offsets[5][K3_VTM_CORRECTION_TEMP_CNT] = {
@@ -298,16 +297,16 @@ static void get_efuse_values(int id, struct k3_thermal_data *data, int *err,
/* Extract the offset value using bit-mask */
if (ct_offsets[id][i] == -1 && i == 1) {
/* 25C offset Case of Sensor 2 split between 2 regs */
- tmp = (readl(bgp->fuse_base + 0x8) & 0xE0000000) >> (29);
- tmp |= ((readl(bgp->fuse_base + 0xC) & 0x1F) << 3);
+ tmp = (readl(fuse_base + 0x8) & 0xE0000000) >> (29);
+ tmp |= ((readl(fuse_base + 0xC) & 0x1F) << 3);
pow = tmp & 0x80;
} else if (ct_offsets[id][i] == -1 && i == 2) {
/* 125C Case of Sensor 3 split between 2 regs */
- tmp = (readl(bgp->fuse_base + 0x4) & 0xF8000000) >> (27);
- tmp |= ((readl(bgp->fuse_base + 0x8) & 0xF) << 5);
+ tmp = (readl(fuse_base + 0x4) & 0xF8000000) >> (27);
+ tmp |= ((readl(fuse_base + 0x8) & 0xF) << 5);
pow = tmp & 0x100;
} else {
- tmp = readl(bgp->fuse_base + ct_offsets[id][i]);
+ tmp = readl(fuse_base + ct_offsets[id][i]);
tmp &= ct_bm[id][i];
tmp = tmp >> __ffs(ct_bm[id][i]);
@@ -356,6 +355,7 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct thermal_zone_device *ti_thermal;
int *ref_table;
struct err_values err_vals;
+ void __iomem *fuse_base;
const s64 golden_factors[] = {
-490019999999999936,
@@ -387,9 +387,9 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(bgp->cfg2_base);
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
- bgp->fuse_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
- if (IS_ERR(bgp->fuse_base))
- return PTR_ERR(bgp->fuse_base);
+ fuse_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(fuse_base))
+ return PTR_ERR(fuse_base);
driver_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
if (driver_data)
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/* Workaround not needed if bit30/bit31 is set even for J721e */
- if (workaround_needed && (readl(bgp->fuse_base + 0x0) & 0xc0000000) == 0xc0000000)
+ if (workaround_needed && (readl(fuse_base + 0x0) & 0xc0000000) == 0xc0000000)
workaround_needed = false;
dev_dbg(bgp->dev, "Work around %sneeded\n",
--
2.38.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists