[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ac447b9-0cb5-2b03-12b5-9c3f1cc7e5fe@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 19:23:30 +0800
From: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, bvanassche@....org, axboe@...nel.dk,
tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: use the correct print format
在 2022/10/10 22:35, Jason Yan 写道:
> While you are at it, can you make all the tid tracing consistent. Some
> tracing points using unsigned long such as:
>
> TRACE_EVENT(jbd2_handle_extend,
> TP_PROTO(dev_t dev, unsigned long tid, unsigned int type,
> unsigned int line_no, int buffer_credits,
> int requested_blocks),
>
> TP_ARGS(dev, tid, type, line_no, buffer_credits, requested_blocks),
>
>
> and the caller passing transaction->t_tid which is tid_t(unsigned int).
>
> trace_jbd2_handle_extend(journal->j_fs_dev->bd_dev,
> transaction->t_tid,
> handle->h_type, handle->h_line_no,
> handle->h_total_credits,
> nblocks);
Ok, I'll send another patch to fix this problem.
Thanks
Bixuan Cui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists