[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da6d7a9a-49a8-0116-2507-f5c8057eaf42@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:07:20 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] blk-cgroup: correct comment for blk_alloc_queue and
blk_exit_queue
on 10/11/2022 4:26 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:38:57AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> Since commit 1059699f87eb("block: move blkcg initialization/destroy into
>> disk allocation/release handler"), blk_alloc_queue and blk_exit_queue is
>> called directly from gendisk. Update the corresponding comment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-cgroup.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> index bc4dec705572..463c568d3e86 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ static int blkcg_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>> * blkcg_init_queue - initialize blkcg part of request queue
>> * @q: request_queue to initialize
>> *
>> - * Called from blk_alloc_queue(). Responsible for initializing blkcg
>> + * Called from gendisk. Responsible for initializing blkcg
>
> Maybe be a bit more specific and say blk_alloc_disk()?
Thanks for review. I will update this in next version.
>
>> * part of new request_queue @q.
>> *
>> * RETURNS:
>> @@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ int blkcg_init_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>> * blkcg_exit_queue - exit and release blkcg part of request_queue
>> * @q: request_queue being released
>> *
>> - * Called from blk_exit_queue(). Responsible for exiting blkcg part.
>> + * Called from gendisk. Responsible for exiting blkcg part.
>
> Ditto.
>
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists