[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e64594f9-e5dc-9a79-8240-fa0e749b9655@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 08:08:16 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Siarhei Volkau <lis8215@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: ingenic: Add support for the JZ4755 SoC
On 10/10/2022 16:18, Siarhei Volkau wrote:
> пн, 10 окт. 2022 г. в 17:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>:
>
>> How do you plan to merge it? Usually these go via subsystem trees...
>
> It's a new case for me, could you explain the problem a bit more?
> What things should I bother with in the next patchset version?
> Thanks in advance.
Each binding goes via subsystem maintainer, not via DT bindings tree, so
keeping all in one patch messes with that.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists