| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 14:58:36 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix missing SIGTRAPs
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Subject: perf: Fix missing SIGTRAPs
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Thu Oct 6 15:00:39 CEST 2022
>
> Marco reported:
>
> Due to the implementation of how SIGTRAP are delivered if
> perf_event_attr::sigtrap is set, we've noticed 3 issues:
>
> 1. Missing SIGTRAP due to a race with event_sched_out() (more
> details below).
>
> 2. Hardware PMU events being disabled due to returning 1 from
> perf_event_overflow(). The only way to re-enable the event is
> for user space to first "properly" disable the event and then
> re-enable it.
>
> 3. The inability to automatically disable an event after a
> specified number of overflows via PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH.
>
> The worst of the 3 issues is problem (1), which occurs when a
> pending_disable is "consumed" by a racing event_sched_out(), observed
> as follows:
>
> CPU0 | CPU1
> --------------------------------+---------------------------
> __perf_event_overflow() |
> perf_event_disable_inatomic() |
> pending_disable = CPU0 | ...
> | _perf_event_enable()
> | event_function_call()
> | task_function_call()
> | /* sends IPI to CPU0 */
> <IPI> | ...
> __perf_event_enable() +---------------------------
> ctx_resched()
> task_ctx_sched_out()
> ctx_sched_out()
> group_sched_out()
> event_sched_out()
> pending_disable = -1
> </IPI>
> <IRQ-work>
> perf_pending_event()
> perf_pending_event_disable()
> /* Fails to send SIGTRAP because no pending_disable! */
> </IRQ-work>
>
> In the above case, not only is that particular SIGTRAP missed, but also
> all future SIGTRAPs because 'event_limit' is not reset back to 1.
>
> To fix, rework pending delivery of SIGTRAP via IRQ-work by introduction
> of a separate 'pending_sigtrap', no longer using 'event_limit' and
> 'pending_disable' for its delivery.
>
> Additionally; and different to Marco's proposed patch:
>
> - recognise that pending_disable effectively duplicates oncpu for
> the case where it is set. As such, change the irq_work handler to
> use ->oncpu to target the event and use pending_* as boolean toggles.
>
> - observe that SIGTRAP targets the ctx->task, so the context switch
> optimization that carries contexts between tasks is invalid. If
> the irq_work were delayed enough to hit after a context switch the
> SIGTRAP would be delivered to the wrong task.
>
> - observe that if the event gets scheduled out
> (rotation/migration/context-switch/...) the irq-work would be
> insufficient to deliver the SIGTRAP when the event gets scheduled
> back in (the irq-work might still be pending on the old CPU).
>
> Therefore have event_sched_out() convert the pending sigtrap into a
> task_work which will deliver the signal at return_to_user.
>
> Fixes: 97ba62b27867 ("perf: Add support for SIGTRAP on perf events")
> Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Debugged-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
.. fuzzing, and lots of concurrent sigtrap_threads with this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221011124534.84907-1-elver@google.com/
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
My original patch also attributed Dmitry:
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Debugged-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
... we all melted our brains on this one. :-)
Would be good to get the fix into one of the upcoming 6.1-rc.
Thanks!
-- Marco
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 19 ++++-
> kernel/events/core.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 2
> 3 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -736,11 +736,14 @@ struct perf_event {
> struct fasync_struct *fasync;
>
> /* delayed work for NMIs and such */
> - int pending_wakeup;
> - int pending_kill;
> - int pending_disable;
> + unsigned int pending_wakeup;
> + unsigned int pending_kill;
> + unsigned int pending_disable;
> + unsigned int pending_sigtrap;
> unsigned long pending_addr; /* SIGTRAP */
> - struct irq_work pending;
> + struct irq_work pending_irq;
> + struct callback_head pending_task;
> + unsigned int pending_work;
>
> atomic_t event_limit;
>
> @@ -857,6 +860,14 @@ struct perf_event_context {
> #endif
> void *task_ctx_data; /* pmu specific data */
> struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> +
> + /*
> + * Sum (event->pending_sigtrap + event->pending_work)
> + *
> + * The SIGTRAP is targeted at ctx->task, as such it won't do changing
> + * that until the signal is delivered.
> + */
> + local_t nr_pending;
> };
>
> /*
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> #include <linux/highmem.h>
> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/buildid.h>
> +#include <linux/task_work.h>
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> @@ -2268,11 +2269,26 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event
> event->pmu->del(event, 0);
> event->oncpu = -1;
>
> - if (READ_ONCE(event->pending_disable) >= 0) {
> - WRITE_ONCE(event->pending_disable, -1);
> + if (event->pending_disable) {
> + event->pending_disable = 0;
> perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
> state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
> }
> +
> + if (event->pending_sigtrap) {
> + bool dec = true;
> +
> + event->pending_sigtrap = 0;
> + if (state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF &&
> + !event->pending_work) {
> + event->pending_work = 1;
> + dec = false;
> + task_work_add(current, &event->pending_task, TWA_RESUME);
> + }
> + if (dec)
> + local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> + }
> +
> perf_event_set_state(event, state);
>
> if (!is_software_event(event))
> @@ -2424,7 +2440,7 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(struct
> * hold the top-level event's child_mutex, so any descendant that
> * goes to exit will block in perf_event_exit_event().
> *
> - * When called from perf_pending_event it's OK because event->ctx
> + * When called from perf_pending_irq it's OK because event->ctx
> * is the current context on this CPU and preemption is disabled,
> * hence we can't get into perf_event_task_sched_out for this context.
> */
> @@ -2463,9 +2479,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_disable);
>
> void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> - WRITE_ONCE(event->pending_disable, smp_processor_id());
> - /* can fail, see perf_pending_event_disable() */
> - irq_work_queue(&event->pending);
> + event->pending_disable = 1;
> + irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq);
> }
>
> #define MAX_INTERRUPTS (~0ULL)
> @@ -3420,11 +3435,23 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out
> raw_spin_lock_nested(&next_ctx->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> if (context_equiv(ctx, next_ctx)) {
>
> + perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
> +
> + /* PMIs are disabled; ctx->nr_pending is stable. */
> + if (local_read(&ctx->nr_pending) ||
> + local_read(&next_ctx->nr_pending)) {
> + /*
> + * Must not swap out ctx when there's pending
> + * events that rely on the ctx->task relation.
> + */
> + raw_spin_unlock(&next_ctx->lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + goto inside_switch;
> + }
> +
> WRITE_ONCE(ctx->task, next);
> WRITE_ONCE(next_ctx->task, task);
>
> - perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
> -
> if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && pmu->sched_task)
> pmu->sched_task(ctx, false);
>
> @@ -3465,6 +3492,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out
> raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
>
> +inside_switch:
> if (cpuctx->sched_cb_usage && pmu->sched_task)
> pmu->sched_task(ctx, false);
> task_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx, EVENT_ALL);
> @@ -4931,7 +4959,7 @@ static void perf_addr_filters_splice(str
>
> static void _free_event(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> - irq_work_sync(&event->pending);
> + irq_work_sync(&event->pending_irq);
>
> unaccount_event(event);
>
> @@ -6431,7 +6459,8 @@ static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_eve
> return;
>
> /*
> - * perf_pending_event() can race with the task exiting.
> + * Both perf_pending_task() and perf_pending_irq() can race with the
> + * task exiting.
> */
> if (current->flags & PF_EXITING)
> return;
> @@ -6440,23 +6469,33 @@ static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_eve
> event->attr.type, event->attr.sig_data);
> }
>
> -static void perf_pending_event_disable(struct perf_event *event)
> +/*
> + * Deliver the pending work in-event-context or follow the context.
> + */
> +static void __perf_pending_irq(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> - int cpu = READ_ONCE(event->pending_disable);
> + int cpu = READ_ONCE(event->oncpu);
>
> + /*
> + * If the event isn't running; we done. event_sched_out() will have
> + * taken care of things.
> + */
> if (cpu < 0)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Yay, we hit home and are in the context of the event.
> + */
> if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
> - WRITE_ONCE(event->pending_disable, -1);
> -
> - if (event->attr.sigtrap) {
> + if (event->pending_sigtrap) {
> + event->pending_sigtrap = 0;
> perf_sigtrap(event);
> - atomic_set_release(&event->event_limit, 1); /* rearm event */
> - return;
> + local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> + }
> + if (event->pending_disable) {
> + event->pending_disable = 0;
> + perf_event_disable_local(event);
> }
> -
> - perf_event_disable_local(event);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -6476,35 +6515,62 @@ static void perf_pending_event_disable(s
> * irq_work_queue(); // FAILS
> *
> * irq_work_run()
> - * perf_pending_event()
> + * perf_pending_irq()
> *
> * But the event runs on CPU-B and wants disabling there.
> */
> - irq_work_queue_on(&event->pending, cpu);
> + irq_work_queue_on(&event->pending_irq, cpu);
> }
>
> -static void perf_pending_event(struct irq_work *entry)
> +static void perf_pending_irq(struct irq_work *entry)
> {
> - struct perf_event *event = container_of(entry, struct perf_event, pending);
> + struct perf_event *event = container_of(entry, struct perf_event, pending_irq);
> int rctx;
>
> - rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
> /*
> * If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
> * and we won't recurse 'further'.
> */
> + rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
>
> - perf_pending_event_disable(event);
> -
> + /*
> + * The wakeup isn't bound to the context of the event -- it can happen
> + * irrespective of where the event is.
> + */
> if (event->pending_wakeup) {
> event->pending_wakeup = 0;
> perf_event_wakeup(event);
> }
>
> + __perf_pending_irq(event);
> +
> if (rctx >= 0)
> perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
> }
>
> +static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> +{
> + struct perf_event *event = container_of(head, struct perf_event, pending_task);
> + int rctx;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
> + * and we won't recurse 'further'.
> + */
> + preempt_disable_notrace();
> + rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
> +
> + if (event->pending_work) {
> + event->pending_work = 0;
> + perf_sigtrap(event);
> + local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> + }
> +
> + if (rctx >= 0)
> + perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
> + preempt_enable_notrace();
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS
> struct perf_guest_info_callbacks __rcu *perf_guest_cbs;
>
> @@ -9188,8 +9254,8 @@ int perf_event_account_interrupt(struct
> */
>
> static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
> - int throttle, struct perf_sample_data *data,
> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> + int throttle, struct perf_sample_data *data,
> + struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> int events = atomic_read(&event->event_limit);
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -9212,24 +9278,36 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct
> if (events && atomic_dec_and_test(&event->event_limit)) {
> ret = 1;
> event->pending_kill = POLL_HUP;
> - event->pending_addr = data->addr;
> -
> perf_event_disable_inatomic(event);
> }
>
> + if (event->attr.sigtrap) {
> + /*
> + * Should not be able to return to user space without processing
> + * pending_sigtrap (kernel events can overflow multiple times).
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(event->pending_sigtrap && event->attr.exclude_kernel);
> + if (!event->pending_sigtrap) {
> + event->pending_sigtrap = 1;
> + local_inc(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> + }
> + event->pending_addr = data->addr;
> + irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq);
> + }
> +
> READ_ONCE(event->overflow_handler)(event, data, regs);
>
> if (*perf_event_fasync(event) && event->pending_kill) {
> event->pending_wakeup = 1;
> - irq_work_queue(&event->pending);
> + irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq);
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> int perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
> - struct perf_sample_data *data,
> - struct pt_regs *regs)
> + struct perf_sample_data *data,
> + struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> return __perf_event_overflow(event, 1, data, regs);
> }
> @@ -11537,8 +11615,8 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr
>
>
> init_waitqueue_head(&event->waitq);
> - event->pending_disable = -1;
> - init_irq_work(&event->pending, perf_pending_event);
> + init_irq_work(&event->pending_irq, perf_pending_irq);
> + init_task_work(&event->pending_task, perf_pending_task);
>
> mutex_init(&event->mmap_mutex);
> raw_spin_lock_init(&event->addr_filters.lock);
> @@ -11560,9 +11638,6 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr
> if (parent_event)
> event->event_caps = parent_event->event_caps;
>
> - if (event->attr.sigtrap)
> - atomic_set(&event->event_limit, 1);
> -
> if (task) {
> event->attach_state = PERF_ATTACH_TASK;
> /*
> --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void perf_output_wakeup(struct pe
> atomic_set(&handle->rb->poll, EPOLLIN);
>
> handle->event->pending_wakeup = 1;
> - irq_work_queue(&handle->event->pending);
> + irq_work_queue(&handle->event->pending_irq);
> }
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists