linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/36] gpiolib: cdev: Add missed header(s)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUhSKuJ3N5zf_+ad_dFu6kSmVTqRpgFUWtd54S9ryw=ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:39:46 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/36] gpiolib: cdev: Add missed header(s)

Hi Andy,

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 4:31 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:13:02PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 04:48:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:05:42AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 3:02 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:14:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > > > -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > > > > >  #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/hte.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok with the hte re-order.
> > > > >
> > > > > But moving the gpio subsystem header after the gpio/driver is not
> > > > > alphabetical ('.' precedes '/') and it read better and made more sense
> > > > > to me the way it was.
> > > >
> > > > I see, I guess this is vim sort vs shell sort. Strange, they should
> > > > follow the locale settings...
> > >
> > > I have checked, the shell and vim sort gave the same result as in this patch.
> > >
> >
> > The original order (sans hte.h) was done by VSCode Sort Lines Ascending,
> > and that still returns the same result.  That matches what I would
> > expect to see given the content of the text.
> >
> > And for me vim also gives the original order.
> >
> > Just to confirm - is '.' 0x2e and '/' 0x2f in your universe?
>
> $ LC_COLLATE=C sort test1.txt
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>
> $ LC_COLLATE= sort test1.txt
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
>
> I guess this explains the difference. Currently I have en_US.UTF-8.

Throwing my can of paint into the mix...

I think it is more logical to first include the general <linux/gpio.h>,
followed by whatever <linux/gpio-foo.h> and <linux/gpio/bar.h>,
irrespective of (language-specific or phonebook) sort order.

Yeah, it sucks that this requires some manual work after running sort...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds