[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbOgHKfe0bq13qnuQ74TiwT6JW_4Rk3-+YvF2kthhdrcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:34:58 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
Delyan Kratunov <delyank@...com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 4/6] selftest/bpf: Fix memory leak in kprobe_multi_test
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:08 AM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> The get_syms() function in kprobe_multi_test.c does not free the string
> memory allocated by sscanf correctly. Fix it.
>
> Fixes: 5b6c7e5c4434 ("selftests/bpf: Add attach bench test")
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> index d457a55ff408..07dd2c5b7f98 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -360,15 +360,14 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp)
> * to them. Filter out the current culprits - arch_cpu_idle
> * and rcu_* functions.
> */
> - if (!strcmp(name, "arch_cpu_idle"))
> - continue;
> - if (!strncmp(name, "rcu_", 4))
> - continue;
> - if (!strcmp(name, "bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func"))
> - continue;
> - if (!strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__",
> - sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1))
> + if (!strcmp(name, "arch_cpu_idle") ||
> + !strncmp(name, "rcu_", 4) ||
> + !strcmp(name, "bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func") ||
> + !strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__",
> + sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1)) {
> + free(name);
> continue;
> + }
it seems cleaner if we add if (name) free(name) under error: goto
label. And in the success case when we assign name to syms[cnt] we can
reset name to NULL to avoid double-free. WDYT?
> err = hashmap__add(map, name, NULL);
> if (err) {
> free(name);
> @@ -394,7 +393,7 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp)
> hashmap__free(map);
> if (err) {
> for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
> - free(syms[cnt]);
> + free(syms[i]);
> free(syms);
> }
> return err;
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists