lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:50:08 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, clm@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 40/46] btrfs: separate out the eb and extent state leak helpers

From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>

[ Upstream commit a40246e8afc0af3ffdee21854fb755c9364b8346 ]

Currently we have the add/del functions generic so that we can use them
for both extent buffers and extent states.  We want to separate this
code however, so separate these helpers into per-object helpers in
anticipation of the split.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index cf4f19e80e2f..d9d254b59bd1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -44,25 +44,42 @@ static inline bool extent_state_in_tree(const struct extent_state *state)
 static LIST_HEAD(states);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(leak_lock);
 
-static inline void btrfs_leak_debug_add(spinlock_t *lock,
-					struct list_head *new,
-					struct list_head *head)
+static inline void btrfs_leak_debug_add_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&fs_info->eb_leak_lock, flags);
+	list_add(&eb->leak_list, &fs_info->allocated_ebs);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fs_info->eb_leak_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static inline void btrfs_leak_debug_add_state(struct extent_state *state)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
-	list_add(new, head);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&leak_lock, flags);
+	list_add(&state->leak_list, &states);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&leak_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static inline void btrfs_leak_debug_del_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&fs_info->eb_leak_lock, flags);
+	list_del(&eb->leak_list);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fs_info->eb_leak_lock, flags);
 }
 
-static inline void btrfs_leak_debug_del(spinlock_t *lock,
-					struct list_head *entry)
+static inline void btrfs_leak_debug_del_state(struct extent_state *state)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
-	list_del(entry);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&leak_lock, flags);
+	list_del(&state->leak_list);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&leak_lock, flags);
 }
 
 void btrfs_extent_buffer_leak_debug_check(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
@@ -126,9 +143,11 @@ static inline void __btrfs_debug_check_extent_io_range(const char *caller,
 	}
 }
 #else
-#define btrfs_leak_debug_add(lock, new, head)	do {} while (0)
-#define btrfs_leak_debug_del(lock, entry)	do {} while (0)
-#define btrfs_extent_state_leak_debug_check()	do {} while (0)
+#define btrfs_leak_debug_add_eb(eb)			do {} while (0)
+#define btrfs_leak_debug_add_state(state)		do {} while (0)
+#define btrfs_leak_debug_del_eb(eb)			do {} while (0)
+#define btrfs_leak_debug_del_state(state)		do {} while (0)
+#define btrfs_extent_state_leak_debug_check()		do {} while (0)
 #define btrfs_debug_check_extent_io_range(c, s, e)	do {} while (0)
 #endif
 
@@ -353,7 +372,7 @@ static struct extent_state *alloc_extent_state(gfp_t mask)
 	state->state = 0;
 	state->failrec = NULL;
 	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&state->rb_node);
-	btrfs_leak_debug_add(&leak_lock, &state->leak_list, &states);
+	btrfs_leak_debug_add_state(state);
 	refcount_set(&state->refs, 1);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&state->wq);
 	trace_alloc_extent_state(state, mask, _RET_IP_);
@@ -366,7 +385,7 @@ void free_extent_state(struct extent_state *state)
 		return;
 	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&state->refs)) {
 		WARN_ON(extent_state_in_tree(state));
-		btrfs_leak_debug_del(&leak_lock, &state->leak_list);
+		btrfs_leak_debug_del_state(state);
 		trace_free_extent_state(state, _RET_IP_);
 		kmem_cache_free(extent_state_cache, state);
 	}
@@ -5856,7 +5875,7 @@ static void btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 static inline void btrfs_release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
 	btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages(eb);
-	btrfs_leak_debug_del(&eb->fs_info->eb_leak_lock, &eb->leak_list);
+	btrfs_leak_debug_del_eb(eb);
 	__free_extent_buffer(eb);
 }
 
@@ -5873,8 +5892,7 @@ __alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start,
 	eb->bflags = 0;
 	init_rwsem(&eb->lock);
 
-	btrfs_leak_debug_add(&fs_info->eb_leak_lock, &eb->leak_list,
-			     &fs_info->allocated_ebs);
+	btrfs_leak_debug_add_eb(eb);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->release_list);
 
 	spin_lock_init(&eb->refs_lock);
@@ -6342,7 +6360,7 @@ static int release_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 			spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
 		}
 
-		btrfs_leak_debug_del(&eb->fs_info->eb_leak_lock, &eb->leak_list);
+		btrfs_leak_debug_del_eb(eb);
 		/* Should be safe to release our pages at this point */
 		btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages(eb);
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
-- 
2.35.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ