[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xhsmhlepmflox.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:02:06 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
x86@...nel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] irq_work: Trace calls to arch_irq_work_raise()
On 08/10/22 15:34, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 16:45:32 +0100
> Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com> wrote:
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void irq_work_raise(void)
>> +{
>> + if (arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
>> + trace_ipi_send_cpu(_RET_IP_, smp_processor_id());
>
> To save on the branch, let's make the above:
>
> if (trace_ipi_send_cpu_enabled() && arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
>
> As the "trace_*_enabled()" is a static branch that will make it a nop
> when the tracepoint is not enabled.
>
Makes sense, thanks for the suggestion.
> -- Steve
>
>
>> +
>> + arch_irq_work_raise();
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Enqueue on current CPU, work must already be claimed and preempt disabled */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists