linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] Remove Intel compiler support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:43:38 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, devel@...ica.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Remove Intel compiler support

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:18 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 5:18 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > include/linux/compiler-intel.h had no update in the past 3 years.
> >
> > We often forget about the third C compiler to build the kernel.
> >
> > For example, commit a0a12c3ed057 ("asm goto: eradicate CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO")
> > only mentioned GCC and Clang.
> >
> > init/Kconfig defines CC_IS_GCC and CC_IS_CLANG but not CC_IS_ICC,
> > and nobody has reported any issue.
> >
> > I guess the Intel Compiler support is broken, and nobody is caring
> > about it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >
> > I am sending this to Linus and the x86 maintainers with RFC.
> > If somebody is still using ICC, please speak up!
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
>
> I had the same thought a while back and tried to show that it as
> already broken, but I never managed to actually download the compiler
> at the time.
>
> It appears that in the meantime, Intel have completely dropped their
> old codebase and moved to using LLVM[1], so my guess is that with the
> current releases it will behave the same as clang. It might help
> to verify that this is indeed the case if you want to add that
> to the changelog text.

This is my thought, too.  I'm happy to help folks working on icx to
get icx up and running for kernel builds, if there's interest.

Change LGTM; there's probably some refactoring we might be able to do
as a result of this; we might be able to move more common definitions
out of include/linux/compiler-gcc.h and include/linux/compiler-clang.h
into include/linux/compiler_types.h, but that can wait until after
this change.

Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

>
>      Arnd
>
> [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/adoption-of-llvm-complete-icx.html



-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers