[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221011022153epcms2p1fcbf889099bd74279ed0d9b51ff26c1b@epcms2p1>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:21:53 +0900
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>, ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unnecessary if statement
Hi Bean Huo,
I think ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun() is also used for wb_buf_alloc_units_show() in ufs-sysfs.c.
So just removing this if-checkup will make different result when check lun value.
Thanks,
Daejun
>From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>
>LUs with WB potential support are properly checked in ufshcd_wb_probe()
>before calling ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param(), so remove this unnecessary
>if-checkup in ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun() to match its function definition.
>
>Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>index f68ca33f6ac7..2457b005101a 100644
>--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>@@ -300,9 +300,6 @@ static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
> pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
> return false;
> }
>- /* WB is available only for the logical unit from 0 to 7 */
>- if (param_offset == UNIT_DESC_PARAM_WB_BUF_ALLOC_UNITS)
>- return lun < UFS_UPIU_MAX_WB_LUN_ID;
> return lun == UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN || (lun < dev_info->max_lu_supported);
> }
>
>--
>2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists