[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62f485df-4f5e-64a2-1294-6e162de25556@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 12:13:36 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix "Track with sched_switch" test by not printing
warnings in quiet mode
On 12/10/2022 12:10, James Clark wrote:
> Especially when CONFIG_LOCKDEP and other debug configs are enabled,
> Perf can print the following warning when running the "Track with
> sched_switch" test:
Oops got the wrong test name here and in the title. Should be "kernel
lock contention analysis test"
>
> Warning:
> Processed 1378918 events and lost 4 chunks!
>
> Check IO/CPU overload!
>
> Warning:
> Processed 4593325 samples and lost 70.00%!
>
> The test already supplies -q to run in quiet mode, so extend quiet mode
> to perf_stdio__warning() and also ui__warning() for consistency.
>
> This fixes the following failure due to the extra lines counted:
>
> perf test "lock cont" -vvv
>
> 82: kernel lock contention analysis test :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 3125
> Testing perf lock record and perf lock contention
> [Fail] Recorded result count is not 1: 9
> test child finished with -1
> ---- end ----
> kernel lock contention analysis test: FAILED!
>
> Fixes: ec685de25b67 ("perf test: Add kernel lock contention test")
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> ---
> tools/perf/ui/util.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/util.c b/tools/perf/ui/util.c
> index 689b27c34246..1d38ddf01b60 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/util.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/util.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ static int perf_stdio__error(const char *format, va_list args)
>
> static int perf_stdio__warning(const char *format, va_list args)
> {
> + if (quiet)
> + return 0;
> +
> fprintf(stderr, "Warning:\n");
> vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> return 0;
> @@ -45,6 +48,8 @@ int ui__warning(const char *format, ...)
> {
> int ret;
> va_list args;
> + if (quiet)
> + return 0;
>
> va_start(args, format);
> ret = perf_eops->warning(format, args);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists