lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221012131330.32456-1-lhenriques@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:13:30 +0100
From:   Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
To:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix BUG_ON() when directory entry has invalid rec_len

The rec_len field in the directory entry has to be a multiple of 4.  A
corrupted filesystem image can be used to hit a BUG() in
ext4_rec_len_to_disk(), called from make_indexed_dir().

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4.h:2413!
 ...
 RIP: 0010:make_indexed_dir+0x53f/0x5f0
 ...
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ? add_dirent_to_buf+0x1b2/0x200
  ext4_add_entry+0x36e/0x480
  ext4_add_nondir+0x2b/0xc0
  ext4_create+0x163/0x200
  path_openat+0x635/0xe90
  do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160
  ? __create_object.isra.0+0x1de/0x3b0
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x12/0x30
  do_sys_openat2+0x91/0x150
  __x64_sys_open+0x6c/0xa0
  do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x80
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

The fix simply adds a call to ext4_check_dir_entry() to validate the
directory entry, returning -EFSCORRUPTED if the entry is invalid.

CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216540
Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
---
* Changes since v1:

As suggested by Ted, I've removed the incorrect 'de->rec_len' check from
previous version and replaced it with a call to ext4_check_dir_entry()
instead, which is a much more complete verification.

 fs/ext4/namei.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index 3a31b662f661..ed76e89ffbe9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -2254,8 +2254,16 @@ static int make_indexed_dir(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_filename *fname,
 	memset(de, 0, len); /* wipe old data */
 	de = (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *) data2;
 	top = data2 + len;
-	while ((char *)(de2 = ext4_next_entry(de, blocksize)) < top)
+	while ((char *)(de2 = ext4_next_entry(de, blocksize)) < top) {
+		if (ext4_check_dir_entry(dir, NULL, de, bh2, data2, len,
+					 (data2 + (blocksize - csum_size) -
+					  (char *) de))) {
+			brelse(bh2);
+			brelse(bh);
+			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+		}
 		de = de2;
+	}
 	de->rec_len = ext4_rec_len_to_disk(data2 + (blocksize - csum_size) -
 					   (char *) de, blocksize);
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ