[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0bA8HUL9eC3Dp8C@wendy>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:28:16 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: jump_label: mark arguments as const to satisfy
asm constraints
Hey Jisheng,
LKP reported an error that seems to only have gone to myself & Samuel,
but the branch it's complaining about is your v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202210122123.Cc4FPShJ-lkp@intel.com/
Any idea what the story is here?
Thanks,
Conor.
On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:54:37PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Samuel reported that the static branch usage in cpu_relax() breaks
> building with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE:
>
> In file included from <command-line>:
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h: In function 'cpu_relax':
> ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:285:33: warning: 'asm' operand 0
> probably does not match constraints
> 285 | #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) asm goto(x)
> | ^~~
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h:41:9: note: in expansion of macro
> 'asm_volatile_goto'
> 41 | asm_volatile_goto(
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:285:33: error: impossible constraint
> in 'asm'
> 285 | #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) asm goto(x)
> | ^~~
> ./arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h:41:9: note: in expansion of macro
> 'asm_volatile_goto'
> 41 | asm_volatile_goto(
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249:
> arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/riscv/Makefile:128: vdso_prepare] Error 2
>
> Maybe "-Os" prevents GCC from detecting that the key/branch arguments
> can be treated as constants and used as immediate operands. Inspired
> by x86's commit 864b435514b2("x86/jump_label: Mark arguments as const to
> satisfy asm constraints"), and as pointed out by Steven: "The "i"
> constraint needs to be a constant.", let's do similar modifications to
> riscv.
>
> Tested by CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE + gcc and CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE + clang.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220922060958.44203-1-samuel@sholland.org/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210212094059.5f8d05e8@gandalf.local.home/
> Fixes: 8eb060e10185 ("arch/riscv: add Zihintpause support")
> Reported-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
>
> since v1:
> - add Reported-by, Reviewed-by, Fixes and Link tag
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
> index 38af2ec7b9bf..6d58bbb5da46 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h
> @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
>
> #define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE 4
>
> -static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key *key,
> - bool branch)
> +static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key * const key,
> + const bool branch)
> {
> asm_volatile_goto(
> " .option push \n\t"
> @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key *key,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key,
> - bool branch)
> +static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key * const key,
> + const bool branch)
> {
> asm_volatile_goto(
> " .option push \n\t"
> --
> 2.37.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists