[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0bUK6krEQdnFlOg@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:50:19 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Replace kmap/kunmap_atomic calls
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:13:26AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/12/22 00:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > There's no data to show that this change would be useful to do.
>
> Jarkko, I think the overall transition to kmap_local_page() is a good
> one. It is a superior API and having it around will pave the way for
> new features. I don't think we should demand 'data' for each and every
> one of these.
>
> Please take a look around the tree and see how other maintainers are
> handling these patches. They're not limited to SGX.
Sure, I'll take a look for comparison.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists