[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0biBtCUtc2mowbQ@zx2c4.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:49:26 -0600
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
ajd@...ux.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
cuigaosheng1@...wei.com, david@...hat.com, farosas@...ux.ibm.com,
geoff@...radead.org, gustavoars@...nel.org, haren@...ux.ibm.com,
hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, joel@....id.au, lihuafei1@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, mikey@...ling.org, nathan@...nel.org,
nathanl@...ux.ibm.com, nicholas@...ux.ibm.com, npiggin@...il.com,
pali@...nel.org, paul@...l-moore.com, rmclure@...ux.ibm.com,
ruscur@...sell.cc, windhl@....com,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, ye.xingchen@....com.cn,
yuanjilin@...rlc.com, zhengyongjun3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-6.1-1 tag
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:18:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> NIP [c000000000031630] .replay_soft_interrupts+0x60/0x300
> LR [c000000000031964] .arch_local_irq_restore+0x94/0x1c0
> Call Trace:
> [c000000007df3870] [c000000000031964] .arch_local_irq_restore+0x94/0x1c0 (unreliable)
> [c000000007df38f0] [c000000000f8a444] .__schedule+0x664/0xa50
> [c000000007df39d0] [c000000000f8a8b0] .schedule+0x80/0x140
> [c000000007df3a50] [c00000000092f0dc] .try_to_generate_entropy+0x118/0x174
> [c000000007df3b40] [c00000000092e2e4] .urandom_read_iter+0x74/0x140
> [c000000007df3bc0] [c0000000003b0044] .vfs_read+0x284/0x2d0
> [c000000007df3cd0] [c0000000003b0d2c] .ksys_read+0xdc/0x130
> [c000000007df3d80] [c00000000002a88c] .system_call_exception+0x19c/0x330
> [c000000007df3e10] [c00000000000c1d4] system_call_common+0xf4/0x258
Obviously the first couple lines of this concern me a bit. But I think
actually this might just be a catalyst for another bug. You could view
that function as basically just:
while (something)
schedule();
And I guess in the process of calling the scheduler a lot, which toggles
interrupts a lot, something got wedged.
Curious, though, I did try to reproduce this, to no avail. My .config is
https://xn--4db.cc/rBvHWfDZ . What's yours?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists