| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:23:41 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support attaching to
i.MX8QXP M4
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:17:00PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> When M4 is kicked by SCFW, M4 runs in its own hardware partition, Linux
> could only do IPC with M4, it could not start, stop, update image.
>
> We disable recovery reboot when M4 is managed by SCFW, because
> remoteproc core still not support M4 auto-recovery without loading
> image.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 7cc4fd207e2d..a56aecae00c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> @@ -59,6 +60,8 @@
> #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STARTED 0x01
> #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STOP 0x02
>
> +#define IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED 5
> +
> /**
> * struct imx_rproc_mem - slim internal memory structure
> * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> @@ -89,6 +92,10 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> struct work_struct rproc_work;
> struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
> void __iomem *rsc_table;
> + struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc_handle;
> + struct notifier_block rproc_nb;
> + u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
> + u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
> };
>
> static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> @@ -117,6 +124,18 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> { 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> };
>
> +static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp[] = {
> + { 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> + /* TCML/U */
> + { 0x1FFE0000, 0x34FE0000, 0x00040000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM },
> + /* OCRAM(Low 96KB) */
> + { 0x21000000, 0x00100000, 0x00018000, 0 },
> + /* OCRAM */
> + { 0x21100000, 0x00100000, 0x00040000, 0 },
> + /* DDR (Data) */
> + { 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x60000000, 0 },
> +};
> +
> static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mn[] = {
> /* dev addr , sys addr , size , flags */
> /* ITCM */
> @@ -255,6 +274,12 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq = {
> .method = IMX_RPROC_MMIO,
> };
>
> +static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp = {
> + .att = imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp,
> + .att_size = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp),
> + .method = IMX_RPROC_SCU_API,
> +};
> +
> static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp = {
> .att = imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp,
> .att_size = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp),
> @@ -680,6 +705,37 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
> mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> }
>
> +static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> +
> + if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
> + return;
> +
> + if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
Yes, now it makes sense.
> + return;
> +
> + imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED, BIT(priv->rproc_pt), false);
> + imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long event, void *group)
> +{
> + struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(nb, struct imx_rproc, rproc_nb);
> +
> + /* Ignore other irqs */
> + if (!((event & BIT(priv->rproc_pt)) && (*(u8 *)group == IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + rproc_report_crash(priv->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
> +
> + pr_info("Partition%d reset!\n", priv->rproc_pt);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> {
> struct regmap_config config = { .name = "imx-rproc" };
> @@ -689,6 +745,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> struct arm_smccc_res res;
> int ret;
> u32 val;
> + u8 pt;
>
> switch (dcfg->method) {
> case IMX_RPROC_NONE:
> @@ -699,6 +756,51 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> if (res.a0)
> priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> return 0;
> + case IMX_RPROC_SCU_API:
> + ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&priv->ipc_handle);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "fsl,resource-id", &priv->rsrc_id);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No fsl,resource-id property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If Mcore resource is not owned by Acore partition, It is kicked by ROM,
> + * and Linux could only do IPC with Mcore and nothing else.
> + */
> + if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id))
> + return 0;
> +
> + priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> + priv->rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
> +
> + /* Get partition id and enable irq in SCFW */
> + ret = imx_sc_rm_get_resource_owner(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id, &pt);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "not able to get resource owner\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + priv->rproc_pt = pt;
> + priv->rproc_nb.notifier_call = imx_rproc_partition_notify;
> +
> + ret = imx_scu_irq_register_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "register scu notifier failed.\n");
Either make this a dev_err() or remove entirely.
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED, BIT(priv->rproc_pt),
> + true);
> + if (ret) {
> + imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
> + dev_warn(dev, "Enable irq failed.\n");
Same here.
With the above:
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -803,7 +905,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = imx_rproc_clk_enable(priv);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_put_mbox;
> + goto err_put_scu;
>
> INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_rproc_vq_work);
>
> @@ -820,6 +922,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> err_put_clk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> +err_put_scu:
> + imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
> err_put_mbox:
> imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> err_put_wkq:
> @@ -837,6 +941,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> rproc_del(rproc);
> + imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
> imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> destroy_workqueue(priv->workqueue);
> rproc_free(rproc);
> @@ -852,6 +957,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_rproc_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-cm4", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-cm7", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-cm7", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-cm4", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-cm33", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-cm33", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx93 },
> {},
> --
> 2.37.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists