lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:51:56 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>, syzbot+b8c672b0e22615c80fe0@...kaller.appspotmail.com, Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: [PATCH 5.10 02/54] nilfs2: fix use-after-free bug of struct nilfs_root From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com> commit d325dc6eb763c10f591c239550b8c7e5466a5d09 upstream. If the beginning of the inode bitmap area is corrupted on disk, an inode with the same inode number as the root inode can be allocated and fail soon after. In this case, the subsequent call to nilfs_clear_inode() on that bogus root inode will wrongly decrement the reference counter of struct nilfs_root, and this will erroneously free struct nilfs_root, causing kernel oopses. This fixes the problem by changing nilfs_new_inode() to skip reserved inode numbers while repairing the inode bitmap. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221003150519.39789-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com> Reported-by: syzbot+b8c672b0e22615c80fe0@...kaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@...il.com> Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> --- fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ struct inode *nilfs_new_inode(struct ino struct inode *inode; struct nilfs_inode_info *ii; struct nilfs_root *root; + struct buffer_head *bh; int err = -ENOMEM; ino_t ino; @@ -347,11 +348,25 @@ struct inode *nilfs_new_inode(struct ino ii->i_state = BIT(NILFS_I_NEW); ii->i_root = root; - err = nilfs_ifile_create_inode(root->ifile, &ino, &ii->i_bh); + err = nilfs_ifile_create_inode(root->ifile, &ino, &bh); if (unlikely(err)) goto failed_ifile_create_inode; /* reference count of i_bh inherits from nilfs_mdt_read_block() */ + if (unlikely(ino < NILFS_USER_INO)) { + nilfs_warn(sb, + "inode bitmap is inconsistent for reserved inodes"); + do { + brelse(bh); + err = nilfs_ifile_create_inode(root->ifile, &ino, &bh); + if (unlikely(err)) + goto failed_ifile_create_inode; + } while (ino < NILFS_USER_INO); + + nilfs_info(sb, "repaired inode bitmap for reserved inodes"); + } + ii->i_bh = bh; + atomic64_inc(&root->inodes_count); inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode); inode->i_ino = ino;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists