linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 15/27] random: use expired timer rather than wq for mixing fast pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221013175144.105087131@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:52:44 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@...cle.com>,
        Paul Webb <paul.x.webb@...cle.com>,
        Phillip Goerl <phillip.goerl@...cle.com>,
        Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@...cle.com>,
        Nicky Veitch <nicky.veitch@...cle.com>,
        Colm Harrington <colm.harrington@...cle.com>,
        Ramanan Govindarajan <ramanan.govindarajan@...cle.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 15/27] random: use expired timer rather than wq for mixing fast pool

From: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>

commit 748bc4dd9e663f23448d8ad7e58c011a67ea1eca upstream.

Previously, the fast pool was dumped into the main pool periodically in
the fast pool's hard IRQ handler. This worked fine and there weren't
problems with it, until RT came around. Since RT converts spinlocks into
sleeping locks, problems cropped up. Rather than switching to raw
spinlocks, the RT developers preferred we make the transformation from
originally doing:

    do_some_stuff()
    spin_lock()
    do_some_other_stuff()
    spin_unlock()

to doing:

    do_some_stuff()
    queue_work_on(some_other_stuff_worker)

This is an ordinary pattern done all over the kernel. However, Sherry
noticed a 10% performance regression in qperf TCP over a 40gbps
InfiniBand card. Quoting her message:

> MT27500 Family [ConnectX-3] cards:
> Infiniband device 'mlx4_0' port 1 status:
> default gid: fe80:0000:0000:0000:0010:e000:0178:9eb1
> base lid: 0x6
> sm lid: 0x1
> state: 4: ACTIVE
> phys state: 5: LinkUp
> rate: 40 Gb/sec (4X QDR)
> link_layer: InfiniBand
>
> Cards are configured with IP addresses on private subnet for IPoIB
> performance testing.
> Regression identified in this bug is in TCP latency in this stack as reported
> by qperf tcp_lat metric:
>
> We have one system listen as a qperf server:
> [root@...rQperfServer ~]# qperf
>
> Have the other system connect to qperf server as a client (in this
> case, it’s X7 server with Mellanox card):
> [root@...rQperfClient ~]# numactl -m0 -N0 qperf 20.20.20.101 -v -uu -ub --time 60 --wait_server 20 -oo msg_size:4K:1024K:*2 tcp_lat

Rather than incur the scheduling latency from queue_work_on, we can
instead switch to running on the next timer tick, on the same core. This
also batches things a bit more -- once per jiffy -- which is okay now
that mix_interrupt_randomness() can credit multiple bits at once.

Reported-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Paul Webb <paul.x.webb@...cle.com>
Cc: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@...cle.com>
Cc: Phillip Goerl <phillip.goerl@...cle.com>
Cc: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@...cle.com>
Cc: Nicky Veitch <nicky.veitch@...cle.com>
Cc: Colm Harrington <colm.harrington@...cle.com>
Cc: Ramanan Govindarajan <ramanan.govindarajan@...cle.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 58340f8e952b ("random: defer fast pool mixing to worker")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/char/random.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -897,17 +897,20 @@ struct fast_pool {
 	unsigned long pool[4];
 	unsigned long last;
 	unsigned int count;
-	struct work_struct mix;
+	struct timer_list mix;
 };
 
+static void mix_interrupt_randomness(struct timer_list *work);
+
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fast_pool, irq_randomness) = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 #define FASTMIX_PERM SIPHASH_PERMUTATION
-	.pool = { SIPHASH_CONST_0, SIPHASH_CONST_1, SIPHASH_CONST_2, SIPHASH_CONST_3 }
+	.pool = { SIPHASH_CONST_0, SIPHASH_CONST_1, SIPHASH_CONST_2, SIPHASH_CONST_3 },
 #else
 #define FASTMIX_PERM HSIPHASH_PERMUTATION
-	.pool = { HSIPHASH_CONST_0, HSIPHASH_CONST_1, HSIPHASH_CONST_2, HSIPHASH_CONST_3 }
+	.pool = { HSIPHASH_CONST_0, HSIPHASH_CONST_1, HSIPHASH_CONST_2, HSIPHASH_CONST_3 },
 #endif
+	.mix = __TIMER_INITIALIZER(mix_interrupt_randomness, 0)
 };
 
 /*
@@ -949,7 +952,7 @@ int __cold random_online_cpu(unsigned in
 }
 #endif
 
-static void mix_interrupt_randomness(struct work_struct *work)
+static void mix_interrupt_randomness(struct timer_list *work)
 {
 	struct fast_pool *fast_pool = container_of(work, struct fast_pool, mix);
 	/*
@@ -1003,10 +1006,11 @@ void add_interrupt_randomness(int irq)
 	if (new_count < 1024 && !time_is_before_jiffies(fast_pool->last + HZ))
 		return;
 
-	if (unlikely(!fast_pool->mix.func))
-		INIT_WORK(&fast_pool->mix, mix_interrupt_randomness);
 	fast_pool->count |= MIX_INFLIGHT;
-	queue_work_on(raw_smp_processor_id(), system_highpri_wq, &fast_pool->mix);
+	if (!timer_pending(&fast_pool->mix)) {
+		fast_pool->mix.expires = jiffies;
+		add_timer_on(&fast_pool->mix, raw_smp_processor_id());
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_interrupt_randomness);