lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:08:05 +0800
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kevin.tian@...el.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
        vasant.hegde@....com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
        schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device
 registration

Hi Alex,

On 2022/10/13 0:28, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:20:06 +0100
> Robin Murphy<robin.murphy@....com>  wrote:
> 
>> Move the bus setup to iommu_device_register(). This should allow
>> bus_iommu_probe() to be correctly replayed for multiple IOMMU instances,
>> and leaves bus_set_iommu() as a glorified no-op to be cleaned up next.
>>
>> At this point we can also handle cleanup better than just rolling back
>> the most-recently-touched bus upon failure - which may release devices
>> owned by other already-registered instances, and still leave devices on
>> other buses with dangling pointers to the failed instance. Now it's easy
>> to clean up the exact footprint of a given instance, no more, no less.
>>
>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski<m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>> Reviewed-By: Krishna Reddy<vdumpa@...dia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.tian@...el.com>
>> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato<mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>  # s390
>> Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle<schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>  # s390
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy<robin.murphy@....com>
>> ---
>>
>> v4: Factor out the ops check in iommu_device_register() to keep the loop
>> even simpler, and comment the nominal change in behaviour
>>
>>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> This introduces the below lockdep spat regression, bisected to commit:
> 
> 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration")
> 
> This can be reproduced with simple vfio-pci device assignment to a VM
> on x86_64 with VT-d.  Thanks,

Thank you for reporting this. I have proposed below fix:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220927053109.4053662-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/

Does it work for you?

Best regards,
baolu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ