[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f988d278-16e8-bcd0-7603-6079e6b9be84@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:09:19 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, willy@...radead.org, kch@...dia.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, johannes.thumshirn@....com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] block: fix use after free for bd_holder_dir/slave_dir
Hi,
在 2022/10/12 23:49, Greg KH 写道:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:58:38PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> Our test report a following uaf:
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sysfs_remove_link+0x23/0x60
>> Read of size 8 at addr ffff888117398db0 by task dmsetup/1097
>>
>> CPU: 12 PID: 1097 Comm: dmsetup Not tainted 6.0.0-next-20221007-00011-gf46c8956
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-4
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> ? dump_stack_lvl+0x73/0x9f
>> ? print_report+0x249/0x746
>> ? __virt_addr_valid+0xd4/0x200
>> ? sysfs_remove_link+0x23/0x60
>> ? kasan_report+0xc0/0x120
>> ? sysfs_remove_link+0x23/0x60
>> ? __asan_load8+0x74/0x110
>> ? sysfs_remove_link+0x23/0x60
>> ? __unlink_disk_holder.isra.0+0x2f/0x80
>> ? bd_unlink_disk_holder+0xd2/0x1c0
>> ? dm_put_table_device+0xf1/0x250
>> ? dm_put_device+0x14f/0x230
>> ? linear_dtr+0x34/0x50
>> ? dm_table_destroy+0x7b/0x280
>> ? table_load+0x34a/0x710
>> ? list_devices+0x4c0/0x4c0
>> ? kvmalloc_node+0x7d/0x160
>> ? __kmalloc_node+0x185/0x2b0
>> ? ctl_ioctl+0x388/0x7b0
>> ? list_devices+0x4c0/0x4c0
>> ? free_params+0x50/0x50
>> ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x931/0x10d0
>> ? tick_program_event+0x65/0xd0
>> ? __kasan_check_read+0x1d/0x30
>> ? __fget_light+0xc2/0x370
>> ? dm_ctl_ioctl+0x12/0x20
>> ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0xd5/0x150
>> ? do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
>> ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>> </TASK>
>>
>> Allocated by task 1097:
>> kasan_save_stack+0x26/0x60
>> kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40
>> kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1f/0x40
>> __kasan_kmalloc+0xcb/0xe0
>> kmalloc_trace+0x7e/0x150
>> kobject_create_and_add+0x3d/0xc0
>> device_add_disk+0x429/0x7e0
>> dm_setup_md_queue+0x15b/0x240
>> table_load+0x469/0x710
>> ctl_ioctl+0x388/0x7b0
>> dm_ctl_ioctl+0x12/0x20
>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0xd5/0x150
>> do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>>
>> Freed by task 1097:
>> kasan_save_stack+0x26/0x60
>> kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40
>> kasan_save_free_info+0x32/0x60
>> __kasan_slab_free+0x172/0x2c0
>> __kmem_cache_free+0x11c/0x560
>> kfree+0xd3/0x240
>> dynamic_kobj_release+0x1e/0x60
>> kobject_put+0x192/0x410
>> device_add_disk+0x535/0x7e0
>> dm_setup_md_queue+0x15b/0x240
>> table_load+0x469/0x710
>> ctl_ioctl+0x388/0x7b0
>> dm_ctl_ioctl+0x12/0x20
>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0xd5/0x150
>> do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>>
>> This problem is very easy to reporduce by injecting failure while creating
>> dm, and root cause is that lifetime of bd_holder_dir/slave_dir is
>> problematic:
>>
>> 1) device alloc
>> alloc_disk_node
>> kzalloc_node -> gendisk
>> disk->part0 = bdev_alloc -> part0
>> device_initialize
>> kobject_init() -> part0->bd_device
>>
>> 2) device create
>> device_add_disk
>> device_add
>> kobject_add -> part0->bd_device
>> kobject_create_and_add -> part0->bd_holder_dir
>> kobject_create_and_add -> gendisk->slave_dir
>>
>> 3) device remove
>> del_gendisk
>> kobject_put -> part0->bd_holder_dir
>> kobject_put -> gendisk->slave_dir
>> device_del
>> kobject_del -> part0->bd_device
>>
>> 4) device free
>> disk_release
>> iput
>> bdev_free_inode
>> kfree -> gendisk
>> kmem_cache_free -> part0
>>
>> bd_holder_dir and slave_dir is allocated in step 2), and freed in steup
>> 3), while they are still accessible before step 4).
>>
>> This patch delay the kobject destruction to disk_release/part_release to
>> fix the problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> block/genhd.c | 7 ++++---
>> block/partitions/core.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/base/core.c | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
>> index 514395361d7c..7ebd085d3a3f 100644
>> --- a/block/genhd.c
>> +++ b/block/genhd.c
>> @@ -615,9 +615,6 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
>>
>> blk_unregister_queue(disk);
>>
>> - kobject_put(disk->part0->bd_holder_dir);
>> - kobject_put(disk->slave_dir);
>> -
>> part_stat_set_all(disk->part0, 0);
>> disk->part0->bd_stamp = 0;
>> if (!sysfs_deprecated)
>> @@ -1139,6 +1136,10 @@ static void disk_release(struct device *dev)
>> might_sleep();
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(disk_live(disk));
>>
>> + kobject_put(disk->part0->bd_holder_dir);
>> + kobject_put(disk->slave_dir);
>> + kobject_del(&dev->kobj);
>> +
>> /*
>> * To undo the all initialization from blk_mq_init_allocated_queue in
>> * case of a probe failure where add_disk is never called we have to
>> diff --git a/block/partitions/core.c b/block/partitions/core.c
>> index b8112f52d388..b86a66198cc8 100644
>> --- a/block/partitions/core.c
>> +++ b/block/partitions/core.c
>> @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ static const struct attribute_group *part_attr_groups[] = {
>>
>> static void part_release(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> + kobject_put(dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_holder_dir);
>> + kobject_del(&dev->kobj);
>> put_disk(dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_disk);
>> iput(dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_inode);
>> }
>> @@ -279,7 +281,6 @@ static void delete_partition(struct block_device *part)
>> __invalidate_device(part, true);
>>
>> xa_erase(&part->bd_disk->part_tbl, part->bd_partno);
>> - kobject_put(part->bd_holder_dir);
>> device_del(&part->bd_device);
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
>> index d02501933467..d2ff3d2a8710 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
>> @@ -3712,7 +3712,6 @@ void device_del(struct device *dev)
>> BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE, dev);
>> kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
>> glue_dir = get_glue_dir(dev);
>> - kobject_del(&dev->kobj);
>
> Wait, no, you can't do this without having to change a bunch of other
> code too. This feels really wrong, how did you test that this actually
> works for all devices in the systems (not just block devices)?
Yes, you're right, I just tested some common block devices, and I don't
have a good idea to fix this yet...
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> so NAK on this change.
>
> greg k-h
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists