[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221013054947.1355884-1-pmanank200502@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:19:48 +0530
From: pmanank200502@...il.com
To: rafael@...nel.org
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Manank Patel <pmanank200502@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: acpi_pcc.c: Fix unintentional integer overflow
From: Manank Patel <pmanank200502@...il.com>
Fixed unintentional u32 overflow by casting it to u64 before multiplication.
Signed-off-by: Manank Patel <pmanank200502@...il.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
index ee4ce5ba1fb2..b929d2e5c622 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ acpi_pcc_address_space_handler(u32 function, acpi_physical_address addr,
* processor could be much slower to reply. So add an arbitrary
* amount of wait on top of Nominal.
*/
- usecs_lat = PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM * data->pcc_chan->latency;
+ usecs_lat = PCC_CMD_WAIT_RETRIES_NUM * ((u64) data->pcc_chan->latency);
ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&data->done,
usecs_to_jiffies(usecs_lat));
if (ret == 0) {
--
2.38.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists