lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf1b053d-ffa6-48ab-d2d2-d59ab21afc19@opensource.wdc.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:11:29 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
        "open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)" 
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: TI: X15 the connected SSD is not detected on Linux next 20221006
 tag

On 2022/10/12 16:24, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On TI beagle board x15 the connected SSD is not detected on linux next
> 20221006 tag.
> 
> + export STORAGE_DEV=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-SanDisk_SSD_PLUS_120GB_190702A00D84
> + STORAGE_DEV=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-SanDisk_SSD_PLUS_120GB_190702A00D84
> + test -n /dev/disk/by-id/ata-SanDisk_SSD_PLUS_120GB_190702A00D84
> + echo y
> + mkfs.ext4 /dev/disk/by-id/ata-SanDisk_SSD_PLUS_120GB_190702A00D84
> mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
> The file /dev/disk/by-id/ata-SanDisk_SSD_PLUS_120GB_190702A00D84 does
> not exist and no size was specified.
> + lava-test-raise 'mkfs.ext4
> /dev/disk/by-id/ata-SanDisk_SSD_PLUS_120GB_190702A00D84 failed; job
> exit'
> 
> Test log:
>  - https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/5634743#L2580
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> metadata:
>   git_ref: master
>   git_repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next
>   git_sha: 7da9fed0474b4cd46055dd92d55c42faf32c19ac
>   git_describe: next-20221006
>   kernel_version: 6.0.0
>   kernel-config: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2FkkkZ51ZYhBL1G8D69YX8Pkt5F/config
>   build-url: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next/-/pipelines/659754170
>   artifact-location: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2FkkkZ51ZYhBL1G8D69YX8Pkt5F
>   toolchain: gcc-10

The kernel messages that are shown in the links above do not show any "libata
version 3.00 loaded." message nor any ata/ahci message that I can see. So I
think the eSATA adapter is not even being detected and libata/ahci driver not used.

Was this working before ? If yes, can you try with the following patches reverted ?

d3243965f24a ("ata: make PATA_PLATFORM selectable only for suitable architectures")
3ebe59a54111 ("ata: clean up how architectures enable PATA_PLATFORM and
PATA_OF_PLATFORM")

If reverting these patches restores the eSATA port on this board, then you need
to fix the defconfig for that board.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ