[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221013094742.fftcbdkjipkw3pub@SoMainline.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:47:42 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: align TLMM pin
configuration with DT schema
On 2022-10-11 08:06:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/10/2022 03:45, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-09-30 21:29:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> DT schema expects TLMM pin configuration nodes to be named with
> >> '-state' suffix and their optional children with '-pins' suffix.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> >
> > Perhaps mention more clearly that this is fixing up an earlier patch
> > that tried to address missing `-pins`?
>
> It is not fixing only that patch, but also nodes added later without suffix.
Afaik the node was already there when [1] was applied, it just
accidentally added -pins to cmd twice instead of once to clk and cmd
separately. But feel free to stick to a generic commit message.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220912061746.6311-35-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
- Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists