lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2135037685.24273.1665665172126.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:46:12 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
Cc:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        helpdesk <helpdesk@...nel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: Add linux-um archives to lore.kernel.org?

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "anton ivanov" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
> On 12/10/2022 20:15, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 14:11 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> The linux-um@...ts.infradead.org mailing list is listed in MAINTAINERS
>>> and is quite active [1].  Once in a while a commit links to the
>>> infradead pipermail archive [2] (the link in that commit appears
>>> broken).
>>>
>>> I propose that we add linux-um to the lore.kernel.org archives so
>>> future commits can use lore.kernel.org links that don't depend on
>>> infradead.
>>>
>>> https://korg.docs.kernel.org/lore.html says pipermail archives like
>>> infradead has are not ideal, but I don't have any archives at all, and
>>> I don't know how to get even pipermail archives out of infradead.
>> 
>> I think we talked about this before, but I also don't have any archives
>> worth talking about (only since mid 2019 with a small gap in mid 2020).
>> 
>> If anyone wants to collect the archives from all people, I'm sure it
>> could be done. I can contribute what I have ...
>>
> 
> I am not keeping any (only some of the discussion on my own patches) - I relied
> on the mailing list archive.
> 
>> The tooling makes that pretty simple, actually.
>> 
>> I think lists.infradead.org mostly got lost though, right dwmw2? So that
>> way I don't think we'll find much (old) archives either.

Geert, IIRC you have excellent archives. Maybe you can help us?

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ