[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <166566692515.10648.15937826144484733293@t14-nrb>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 15:15:25 +0200
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix wrong address being used in test
Quoting Janis Schoetterl-Glausch (2022-10-12 22:56:09)
> The guest code sets the key for mem1 only. In order to provoke a
> protection exception the test codes needs to address mem1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists