linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] LoongArch changes for v6.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:27:24 +0800
From:   Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] LoongArch changes for v6.1

Hi, Linus,

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:24 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:51 AM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson.git tags/loongarch-6.1
>
> Grr.
>
> This was rebased mere hours before the pull request.
>
> Much (all?) of it has been in next - with different commit IDs, of
> course, but the question remains why you have rebased it?
I'm very sorry for that. The patches are in linux-next for some days,
but the kernel test robot reports that there is a "define but not
used" warning, so I fixed that warning and rebased.

> It just makes it much less convenient for me to check "was this in
> next?" and is generally a *horrible* thing to do.
I will avoid such operations in future, sorry for that again.

Huacai

>
>                        Linus