lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:40:00 +0800
From:   Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
To:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc:     loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
        Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] LoongArch: BPF: Avoid declare variables in switch-case

Not all compilers support declare variables in switch-case, so move
declarations to the beginning of a function. Otherwise we may get such
build errors:

arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c: In function ‘emit_atomic’:
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:362:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
   u8 r0 = regmap[BPF_REG_0];
   ^~
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c: In function ‘build_insn’:
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:727:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
   u8 t7 = -1;
   ^~
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:778:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
   int ret;
   ^~~
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:779:3: error: expected expression before ‘u64’
   u64 func_addr;
   ^~~
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:780:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
   bool func_addr_fixed;
   ^~~~
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:784:11: error: ‘func_addr’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘in_addr’?
          &func_addr, &func_addr_fixed);
           ^~~~~~~~~
           in_addr
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:784:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:814:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
   u64 imm64 = (u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32 | (u32)insn->imm;
   ^~~

Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
---
 arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
index 43f0a98efe38..2a9b590f47e6 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static void emit_atomic(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 	const u8 t1 = LOONGARCH_GPR_T1;
 	const u8 t2 = LOONGARCH_GPR_T2;
 	const u8 t3 = LOONGARCH_GPR_T3;
+	const u8 r0 = regmap[BPF_REG_0];
 	const u8 src = regmap[insn->src_reg];
 	const u8 dst = regmap[insn->dst_reg];
 	const s16 off = insn->off;
@@ -359,8 +360,6 @@ static void emit_atomic(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 		break;
 	/* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst + off, r0, src); */
 	case BPF_CMPXCHG:
-		u8 r0 = regmap[BPF_REG_0];
-
 		move_reg(ctx, t2, r0);
 		if (isdw) {
 			emit_insn(ctx, lld, r0, t1, 0);
@@ -390,8 +389,11 @@ static bool is_signed_bpf_cond(u8 cond)
 
 static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool extra_pass)
 {
-	const bool is32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU ||
-			  BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
+	u8 t0 = -1;
+	u64 func_addr;
+	bool func_addr_fixed;
+	int i = insn - ctx->prog->insnsi;
+	int ret, jmp_offset;
 	const u8 code = insn->code;
 	const u8 cond = BPF_OP(code);
 	const u8 t1 = LOONGARCH_GPR_T1;
@@ -400,8 +402,8 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
 	const u8 dst = regmap[insn->dst_reg];
 	const s16 off = insn->off;
 	const s32 imm = insn->imm;
-	int jmp_offset;
-	int i = insn - ctx->prog->insnsi;
+	const u64 imm64 = (u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32 | (u32)insn->imm;
+	const bool is32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU || BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
 
 	switch (code) {
 	/* dst = src */
@@ -724,24 +726,23 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
 	case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
 	case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
 	case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
-		u8 t7 = -1;
 		jmp_offset = bpf2la_offset(i, off, ctx);
 		if (imm) {
 			move_imm(ctx, t1, imm, false);
-			t7 = t1;
+			t0 = t1;
 		} else {
 			/* If imm is 0, simply use zero register. */
-			t7 = LOONGARCH_GPR_ZERO;
+			t0 = LOONGARCH_GPR_ZERO;
 		}
 		move_reg(ctx, t2, dst);
 		if (is_signed_bpf_cond(BPF_OP(code))) {
-			emit_sext_32(ctx, t7, is32);
+			emit_sext_32(ctx, t0, is32);
 			emit_sext_32(ctx, t2, is32);
 		} else {
-			emit_zext_32(ctx, t7, is32);
+			emit_zext_32(ctx, t0, is32);
 			emit_zext_32(ctx, t2, is32);
 		}
-		if (emit_cond_jmp(ctx, cond, t2, t7, jmp_offset) < 0)
+		if (emit_cond_jmp(ctx, cond, t2, t0, jmp_offset) < 0)
 			goto toofar;
 		break;
 
@@ -775,10 +776,6 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
 
 	/* function call */
 	case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
-		int ret;
-		u64 func_addr;
-		bool func_addr_fixed;
-
 		mark_call(ctx);
 		ret = bpf_jit_get_func_addr(ctx->prog, insn, extra_pass,
 					    &func_addr, &func_addr_fixed);
@@ -811,8 +808,6 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
 
 	/* dst = imm64 */
 	case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW:
-		u64 imm64 = (u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32 | (u32)insn->imm;
-
 		move_imm(ctx, dst, imm64, is32);
 		return 1;
 
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ