linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <668e5126-f344-c30b-a743-877b1783cec7@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:56:10 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, corbet@....net, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling

On 10/13/22 03:58, Len Brown wrote:
> This series of BUG FIXES needs to be marked for -stable.

Hi Len,

That would have been great feedback to include with your review when
your provided your acks.  It's also not clear where the bug fixes stop
and the "related fixes" begin.  Is the entire series bug fixes that need
to be marked for -stable?