[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0hFCzVck/zBFwiX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:04:11 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Craig Topper <craig.topper@...ive.com>,
Philip Reames <listmail@...lipreames.com>, jh@...user.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: NWFPE: avoid compiler-generated __aeabi_uldivmod
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 03:53:42PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> clang-15's ability to elide loops completely became more aggressive when
> it can deduce how a variable is being updated in a loop. Counting down
> one variable by an increment of another can be replaced by a modulo
> operation.
>
> For 64b variables on 32b ARM EABI targets, this can result in the
> compiler generating calls to __aeabi_uldivmod, which it does for a do
> while loop in float64_rem().
>
> For the kernel, we'd generally prefer that developers not open code 64b
> division via binary / operators and instead use the more explicit
> helpers from div64.h. On arm-linux-gnuabi targets, failure to do so can
> result in linkage failures due to undefined references to
> __aeabi_uldivmod().
>
> While developers can avoid open coding divisions on 64b variables, the
> compiler doesn't know that the Linux kernel has a partial implementation
> of a compiler runtime (--rtlib) to enforce this convention.
>
> It's also undecidable for the compiler whether the code in question
> would be faster to execute the loop vs elide it and do the 64b division.
>
> While I actively avoid using the internal -mllvm command line flags, I
> think we get better code than using barrier() here, which will force
> reloads+spills in the loop for all toolchains.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1666
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
I built ARCH=arm allmodconfig + CONFIG_WERROR=n without this patch and
saw the link failure then applied it and the error went away. Thanks for
all the investigation done into fixing this! I think you put this in the
patch tracker already but just for posterity:
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile b/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> index 303400fa2cdf..2aec85ab1e8b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> @@ -11,3 +11,9 @@ nwfpe-y += fpa11.o fpa11_cpdo.o fpa11_cpdt.o \
> entry.o
>
> nwfpe-$(CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE_XP) += extended_cpdo.o
> +
> +# Try really hard to avoid generating calls to __aeabi_uldivmod() from
> +# float64_rem() due to loop elision.
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +CFLAGS_softfloat.o += -mllvm -replexitval=never
> +endif
> --
> 2.38.0.rc2.412.g84df46c1b4-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists