[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16bee8e7-a9ec-0847-9d89-92484b0399a0@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:45:41 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
avri.altman@....com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, tomas.winkler@...el.com, cang@...eaurora.org,
daejun7.park@...sung.com
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unnecessary if statement
On 10/14/22 13:30, Bean Huo wrote:
> I double-checked the changelog and the stack overflow issue was double
> fixed by your commit:
>
> commit d3d9c4570285 ("scsi: ufs: Fix memory corruption by
> ufshcd_read_desc_param()"),
>
> For example, if the user wants to read wb_buf_alloc_units in the RPMB
> unit descriptor,
>
> parameter offset = 41, parameter size = 4,
> buff_len = 45;
>
> After ufshcd_query_descriptor_retry(), buff_len will be updated to 35.
>
> param_offset > buff_len, then -EINVAL will be returned.
>
> So we can safely remove this check, and if you still have concerns, I
> can verify when I get back to the office.
Hi Bean,
Thank you for having looked this up. I agree with the above.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists