lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:45:41 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        avri.altman@....com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
        beanhuo@...ron.com, tomas.winkler@...el.com, cang@...eaurora.org,
        daejun7.park@...sung.com
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unnecessary if statement

On 10/14/22 13:30, Bean Huo wrote:
> I double-checked the changelog and the stack overflow issue was double
> fixed by your commit:
> 
> commit d3d9c4570285 ("scsi: ufs: Fix memory corruption by
> ufshcd_read_desc_param()"),
> 
> For example, if the user wants to read wb_buf_alloc_units in the RPMB
> unit descriptor,
> 
> parameter offset = 41, parameter size = 4,
> buff_len = 45;
> 
> After ufshcd_query_descriptor_retry(), buff_len will be updated to 35.
> 
> param_offset > buff_len, then -EINVAL will be returned.
> 
> So we can safely remove this check, and if you still have concerns, I
> can verify when I get back to the office.

Hi Bean,

Thank you for having looked this up. I agree with the above.

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ